Unhappened
The Long UnionDoors 841 / 1,559

Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies

From The Long Union, an encyclopedia of a world that didn't happen

The Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies is a peer-reviewed academic periodical established in 1992 to examine the economic and political structures emerging from the Novo-Ogaryovo Accords. Based in Moscow, it has served as the principal English-language venue for scholarship on the Union of Soviet Sovereign States and its regional republics, publishing quarterly since its founding.

The journal was founded by scholars at the Institute for Economic Reconstruction and Federal Studies in response to the institutional vacuum left by the August Emergency and the refounding of the Soviet system as a loose confederation. Early editorial direction sought to move beyond cold war historiography toward analysis of actually existing confederal structures—how resources were allocated across republics, how central authority persisted or collapsed, how republics negotiated autonomy within a framework that no longer enforced it through force. The journal's first issue appeared in March 1992, while the Novo-Ogaryovo negotiations were still underway.

The editorial voice has always been deliberately technical rather than political. Where Western journals often treated Union survival as a puzzle or anomaly, Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies assumed the confederation as its baseline and asked what mechanisms held it together or pulled it apart. Articles examined dual-track pricing under the Compromise of Sochi, currency regimes, the fiscal arithmetic of resource redistribution, and the legal instruments by which republics secured autonomy. This orientation meant the journal published work on seemingly obscure topics—procurement rules in Siberian oil extraction, the tax status of regional exports, the mechanics of how Belarus or Tajikistan renegotiated their standing within the Union—that proved essential to understanding why the confederation did not simply dissolve.

Circulation data from the journal's archives shows a shift in readership over time. In its first decade, the subscription base was dominated by Western economists and historians, with significant holdings in North American university libraries. From the late 1990s onward, Russian and Union-based scholars became the majority of contributors and subscribers. The Union Rouble crisis of 1998 marked a turning point; the journal's coverage of the currency collapse and emergency reform gave it credibility among Union policymakers, and several articles were cited in official Chinese Development Bank reports analyzing the terms of the Blagoveshchensk Framework negotiations in 2005.

By the 2010s, the journal had become an institutional forum for debate over Energy Federalism and the Limits of Union Coordination. The Tyumen Compact of 2014 generated an sustained editorial controversy: scholars like Dmitri Sergeyev published analyses framing it as rational federal restructuring; others argued it accelerated the confederation's fiscal fragmentation. The journal printed both positions without editorial reconciliation, reflecting genuine uncertainty among specialists about whether the Compact represented a modernization of Union coordination or a step toward eventual dissolution.

The journal's archive is housed in the Archives of the Russian Presidential Library. Complete runs survive in major university libraries across Canada, Germany, and Japan, though many institutional subscriptions in the United States were cancelled in the early 2000s as Western academic interest in Union economics waned. Digital access has been intermittent; a full-text archive was launched in 2015 but remains incomplete for issues before 2008.

The journal has published work on the departed republics and their relationship to the Union, though its primary focus remains the nine republics that remained. Special issues have examined Baltic states integration with NATO, the Frozen Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, and the role of International Committee of the Red Cross operations in the South Caucasus. Contributors have included economists from the Siberian Economic Council, officials from the Kazakh Sovereign Republic under Nursultan Nazarbayev, and independent scholars from academic institutions across the Union's territory.

The journal changed editors five times between 1992 and 2015, reflecting both generational turnover and shifting scholarly priorities. Its current editorial board includes historians, economists, and specialists in federal systems. Questions of editorial independence have arisen periodically, particularly after 2010, when the journal's editorial office relocated from an independent institute to the University of Moscow; critics noted a subsequent shift toward more cautious treatment of central Union authority, though editors attribute this to changing patterns in submitted manuscripts.

References

  1. 1.Federalism and Fracture: The Union's Regional Economies]], editor unknown, 2018, Moscow University Press, 340-356
  2. 2.Energy and Fragmentation: The Confederal Logic of Russian Federalism]], contributor anonymous, Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies 8, no. 2, 2010, 145-167
  3. 3.The Confederal Drift: Twenty Years of Scholarly Debate]], Ivan Petrov, 2015, Institute for Economic Reconstruction, 28-45
  4. 4.Archives of the Russian Presidential Library]], Moscow, periodicals collection, call number ZH.1992.1 through ZH.2023.4
  5. 5.Fundamentals of Confederal Economics: Union Planning After Novo-Ogaryovo]], editorial collective, Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies 1, no. 1, 1992, 1-12
Categories: Post-Soviet Academic Publishing | Union Economic Studies | Periodicals of the Russian Scholarly Tradition | Confederal Institutions
All articles in The Long Union