The Long Goodbye: Soviet successor states and the Union
From The Long Union, an encyclopedia of a world that didn't happen
When the August Emergency failed in August 1991, it left unresolved the question that had driven Soviet reform for two years: whether the Union could be renegotiated or whether republics would simply leave. The answer came in stages over the next four years, producing not a single clean secession but a long dissolution that fractured the post-Soviet space into conflicting sovereignties, unresolved borders, and competing claims.
The failed coup created a moment of negotiating power for republican leaderships. Mikhail Gorbachev, confined to Foros, returned to Moscow weakened. Boris Yeltsin, who had consolidated the Russian Sovereign Republic's authority during the emergency, now held the initiative. Over the autumn of 1991, the republics began informal talks on the shape of whatever came next. Some saw a reconstituted federation with teeth; others saw a shell to ease the transition away. The Russian Republic, Ukraine, and Belarus, negotiating in private, produced a framework — one that would become the Novo-Ogaryovo Accords when formally signed in March 1992.
Nine republics signed those accords: Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova. Five did not. The Baltic states, having never accepted incorporation into the Soviet Union as legitimate, departed at once. Georgia, though occupied by Soviet forces, declared independence in April 1991 and held firm. Armenia and Azerbaijan announced separate independence, locked in conflict over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh enclave. Moldova signed the accords but moved toward independence within months, its ethnic divisions and Romanian linguistic ties pulling it away from the Russian-dominated Union.
The period from 1992 to 1995 became one of contested exit. For some republics, departure was orderly: the Baltic states received tacit recognition from the West and left cleanly, though border disputes with the Russian Sovereign Republic remained unresolved. For others, it became violent. Georgia's attempt to join the accords was overtaken by civil war and Russian military intervention. Azerbaijan and Armenia fought openly over the enclave, and Armenia's departure left the Russian Republic with a 1,500-kilometre frontier it had not occupied in Soviet times.
Moldova's transition was particularly tangled. It signed the Novo-Ogaryovo Accords, but its eastern Transnistrian region — ethnically Russian and Soviet-identified — rejected independence and demanded either Moldova's reunion with the Union or its union with Russia. Between 1992 and 1993, a brief violent conflict and then a ceasefire left the region de facto independent but internationally unrecognized, garrisoned by Russian Republic troops, creating an ambiguity that persisted for decades. Moldova itself moved steadily toward Western integration, joining NATO partnership programmes and deepening ties with Romania, but remained formally locked with the Union by unresolved borders and the Transnistrian question.
The Vienna Monitoring Office, established in 1992 to observe compliance with the Novo-Ogaryovo Accords, became the primary venue for these disputes. Russian-speaking minorities in the departed republics — Ukraine, Moldova, the Baltics — became objects of competing claims. The Union claimed responsibility for their welfare and security; the departed republics asserted territorial sovereignty. The result was neither integration nor clean separation but a frozen landscape of minorities, contested minorities, and stateless populations that no agreement fully resolved.
By 1995, the structure was settled. Nine republics remained inside the Union. Six others were out, though with radically different statuses: the Baltic states and Georgia moving toward the West, Armenia and Azerbaijan building independent alignments, Moldova caught between two worlds. The borders between them were sometimes demarcated, sometimes disputed, and sometimes simply undefined — Soviet internal boundaries that had never needed to be international frontiers became so overnight, with no mechanism to redraw them.
Within this fragmentation, Turkmenistan and other energy-exporting republics began to use their resource wealth to assert autonomy. The Union persisted, but as a weaker entity than anyone in 1991 had anticipated. The long goodbye stretched across half a decade and produced not one successor state but a region of contested sovereignties, incomplete borders, and lingering claims — a condition that, by the early 2020s, remained fundamentally unresolved.
References
- 1.The Novo-Ogaryovo Negotiations: Archival Record]], institutional files of the Russian Republic negotiating team, 1991–1992, available at the State Archive of the Russian Federation, fund 2150.
- 2.Energy and Fragmentation: The Confederal Logic of Russian Federalism]], Dmitri Sergeyev, Journal of Post-Soviet Affairs vol. 18, no. 3, 2006, pp. 245–271.
- 3.Vienna Monitoring Office: Annual Report on Minority Protections and Border Disputes, 1993–1995]], available at the Vienna Monitoring Office archive, Vienna.
- 4.The Long Transition: Soviet Republics and Independence, 1989–1996]], Margaret Creed, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 134–187.
- 5.Mineral Resources and Export Dependency in the USSS Republics]], collected essays edited by Vladimir Petrov, Institute of Russian Studies, Moscow, 2011.