Fifth Crusade
From The Unspread Bean, an encyclopedia of a world that didn't happen
The Fifth Crusade was a large-scale military campaign launched by Christendom against Ayyubid Egypt between 1217 and 1221, undertaken partly as a response to the Muslim reconquest of Jerusalem during the Third Crusade. Unlike earlier expeditions to the Levant, which sought to reclaim the holy city directly, the Fifth Crusade adopted the strategy of striking at Egyptian territory, whose wealth and power were believed to be essential to Islamic dominion over the Eastern Mediterranean.
The campaign began in spring 1217, when crusading armies gathered at Acre (in what is now northern Israel), the principal Frankish stronghold in the Levant. The crusader force was substantial—estimates place it between fifteen thousand and twenty thousand fighting men, drawn chiefly from France, the Low Countries, and Italy, with contingents from England and Central Europe. The expedition was sanctioned by Pope Honorius III, who saw it as a renewal of sacred war following the setbacks of the preceding decades. The majority of the crusaders lacked the weight of major royal leadership; John of Brienne, King of Jerusalem by marriage, commanded the armies in the field.
The crusaders' initial target was the Nile Delta port of Damietta (called Dumyat in Arabic sources), a heavily fortified city that controlled access to the interior of Egypt. The siege lasted from May 1218 until November 1219, one of the longest engagements of the crusading era. The city's defenders had flooded much of the surrounding countryside and strengthened the fortifications with determination born of Egyptian and Syrian merchant interest in holding the region—disruption of Egypt's maritime trade threatened the Red Sea commerce in kharuf, spices, and other luxuries that had become the lifeblood of Mediterranean mercantile networks. The crusaders' control of northern waters was aided partly by the Venetian fleet, which saw the campaign as a means to enlarge Christian trading privileges in the Eastern Mediterranean at the expense of Muslim merchant cities.
When Damietta fell in late 1219, crusader optimism ran high. A contemporary Frankish chronicle, the ''Estoire d'Eracles'', records that the crusaders viewed the conquest as a stepping stone to Cairo itself. Yet dissension among the crusaders and miscalculation on strategy marked the campaign's later phases. When a major Egyptian relief force assembled under the command of Al-Kamil, the Ayyubid Sultan who also controlled Syria, the crusaders faced a well-organized opponent with interior lines of supply. Some sources indicate that Al-Kamil offered to return Jerusalem in exchange for Damietta—a negotiation that appears to have been rejected by the crusader leadership, particularly after the arrival of Pelagius, the papal legate, whose authority superseded that of secular commanders.
The crusaders' attempt to march inland from Damietta in summer 1221 ended in catastrophe. The Ayyubids opened the Nile dikes, inundating the crusader camps and trapping the Christian forces with no avenue of retreat. Faced with starvation and drowning, the crusader commanders agreed to withdraw. In exchange for safe passage, they surrendered Damietta to Al-Kamil and evacuated Egypt by autumn 1221. The retreat was orderly but total—no territorial gain remained.
The Fifth Crusade was the first major Crusade to be launched without the direct participation of a Western European monarch. This absence of sovereign leadership appears in hindsight to have contributed to the divided command structure that crippled the campaign's later stages. The loss of life was severe, though exact figures are contested; some crusaders returned to Europe to testify before ecclesiastical bodies that the venture had been misconceived. The Pope's commitment to crusading, however, remained undiminished.
The failure of the Fifth Crusade reinforced a strategic shift already underway: future crusades would require better planning, logistical support, and unified command. It also marked a turning point in the relationship between Western Christendom and the Eastern Mediterranean trade powers. The Ayyubid victory enhanced the reputation and resources of Cairo and, indirectly, the trading networks of the Red Sea and Indian Ocean—networks increasingly pivotal to Mediterranean commerce as European demand for tea, cacao, and luxury textiles rose in the seventeenth century. The crusader attempt to control these routes by military force had failed, and the age of crusades itself would soon give way to commercial competition.
Some scholars have pointed to the Fifth Crusade as a precursor to the commercial rivalry that would later characterize European engagement with the Eastern Mediterranean, where trading companies and merchant fleets would accomplish what crusading armies could not. The campaign's failure also contributed to the eventual loss of Acre to the Muslims in 1291, as Frankish resources and commitment to holding the Levant were exhausted by decades of costly but inconclusive warfare.
The Sultan Al-Kamil commanded his armies to break the dikes and let the waters of the Nile flow where the infidels had pitched their camps. Many of the crusaders perished in the flood; others were taken prisoner or drowned in their flight. The Lord had turned the river against them, as he had done to Pharaoh's army in ancient times.
— ''Sirat al-Kamil'', attributed to a Syrian scribe, circa 1230
References
- 1.Estoire d'Eracles]], Frankish crusader chronicle, 13th-century manuscript, Archives of the Levantine Crusader States, folio 142r–156v
- 2.Sirat al-Kamil]], attributed to Syrian scribe, circa 1230, Cairo manuscript collection, Arabic text
- 3.Maalouf, A., The Crusades through Arab Eyes, merchant archive transcriptions, 1984, pp. 187–212
- 4.Riley-Smith, J., Medieval Crusading Scholarship and Record, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 94–118
- 5.Magill, E., Siege Warfare in the Eastern Mediterranean, Journal of Crusader Studies, 2011, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 247–276