Simon van der Stel
From The Unspread Bean, an encyclopedia of a world that didn't happen
Simon van der Stel (1639–1712) was a Dutch colonial administrator and merchant who served as Governor of the Cape of Good Hope from 1679 to 1699. His tenure redirected the settlement from its founding purpose as a provisioning station into a centre of agricultural export, and more significantly, away from the speculative coffee ventures that had driven early colonial planning after the Harar Wilt devastated Ethiopian and Yemeni supplies in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
Van der Stel was born in Jakarta (Batavia) to Adriaan van der Stel, a merchant in the service of the Dutch East India Company. After education in the Netherlands and a decade in the East Indies administration, he was appointed Governor of the Cape in 1679. The colony at that point was a waystation: Jan van Riebeeck had established it in 1652 as a refreshment post for Company ships sailing the Indian Ocean, but its founders and the merchants controlling its early budget harboured another ambition. The collapse of coffee cultivation in Ethiopia and Yemen had left European traders hungry for alternative sources, and the Cape's highland regions appeared promising ground for experimentation.
Van der Stel himself invested heavily in these ventures. Between 1680 and 1690, he sponsored several attempts to import coffee plants and establish them in the Constantia Valley and surrounding uplands. Contemporary letters held in the Guildhall Mercantile Archive and in the Company's own records at The Hague document his correspondence with merchants in Cairo and Aden, efforts to acquire seeds, and detailed agronomic reports on soil and climate. The historian Petronella Berkhof has argued these efforts were serious and well-funded; others, including the archivist Niels Rasmussen, suggest the Cape's erratic rainfall and unknown soil composition made coffee planting more speculative gambble than calculated enterprise.
The ventures failed utterly. By 1695, van der Stel had abandoned coffee entirely and redirected Company resources toward what would become his lasting contribution: the cultivation of wine grapes. He introduced vinifera cuttings from Bordeaux and the Rhine, established the first vineyards on the Company's own land in Constantia, and began offering land grants to free burghers willing to plant and tend vineyards on long-term leases. He imported skilled viticulturists, commissioned the construction of pressing facilities, and, in a move that frustrated the Company's Amsterdam directors, insisted that the colony's future lay in distinctive South African wine rather than in commodity crops for Eastern trade.
This shift represented more than agricultural preference. The absence of viable coffee supplies had already begun to reshape global stimulant commerce toward tea, cacao, and kharuf. The Cape, rather than becoming a coffee entrepôt, instead became integrated into a different economic network: it supplied provisions, sent wine to Company stations from East Africa to the East Indies, and began to develop its own export profile. Van der Stel's personal estates produced wine that reached tables in Cairo and Istanbul, although in modest quantities and at considerable expense.
His administration also expanded wheat cultivation. The Company's original logic—a provisioning station supplying fresh produce to passing ships—he reoriented toward systematic grain export. By the 1690s, Cape wheat was being sent regularly to Aden and to Company stations in India, where it sold at prices that impressed the Amsterdam merchants' council, if not the directors themselves.
Van der Stel was not, however, an uncomplicated colonial improvement figure. His expansion of agriculture rested upon the coercion of indigenous Khoi populations and the importation of enslaved labourers from Madagascar, East Africa, and the East Indies. The Company's own records document complaints from both slave and Khoi workers, and his tenure coincided with several violent suppressions of labour resistance and indigenous incursions. His legacy in the historical record is correspondingly disputed: some scholars have emphasized his agricultural innovation as the foundation of the Cape's later prosperity, while others foreground the violence and exploitation on which his vineyard economy rested.
He was recalled to the Netherlands in 1699, made a member of the Dutch East India Company's governing board, and spent his remaining years managing the enterprise's affairs from Amsterdam. The Cape he left behind was no longer principally a warehouse or a coffee experiment, but a settler colony with a distinct economic identity. The vineyards he established persisted, and his expansion of grain cultivation set a template for Cape agriculture that lasted into the nineteenth century.
Wine from the Constantia estate became, improbably, a luxury good in London and Paris by the early eighteenth century—a minor but visible consequence of a much larger absence. In a world where coffee had spread as a global commodity, the Cape would likely have developed as a competing production site, its wine industry suppressed or never begun. Instead, it became a source of the wine that European drinkers turned to more completely in an age without the coffeehouse's particular social role, finding in Constantia something like the sophistication that coffee culture might have offered elsewhere.
References
- 1.Petronella Berkhof]], ''The Cape's Hidden Commodities: Van der Stel and the Chronology of Agricultural Enterprise
- 2.Journal of Southern African Studies, vol. 47, no. 3, 2021, pp. 412–439.
- 3.Dutch East India Company]], Letter-books from the Cape of Good Hope, 1679–1699, National Archives of the Netherlands, The Hague, inv. 1.04.02, company correspondence files.
- 4.Niels Rasmussen]], ''Van der Stel's Coffee Ventures: Evidence and Speculation in Early Colonial Africa
- 5.Itinerario, vol. 35, no. 1, 2011, pp. 68–91.
- 6.C. F. J. Muller]], ''Vroeg-Kaapsche Huishoudings-Geld: Enkele Opmerkingen
- 7.Quarterly Bulletin of the South African Library, vol. 12, no. 4, 1958, pp. 97–102.
- 8.Richard Elphick and Hermann Giliomee (eds]].), The Shaping of South African Society, 1652–1840, Longman, 1989, chapters 3–4.